The Middle East conflict has dominated global headlines in recent months, but its impact extends far beyond the region. For businesses operating internationally, the conflict is influencing energy markets, supply chains, employee mobility and sustainability performance, demonstrating how closely ESG priorities are connected to business resilience.
For organisations managing international assignments across Asia, these effects are becoming increasingly tangible. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), around 25–30% of global oil and approximately 20% of liquefied natural gas (LNG) normally pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
Disruptions to this vital shipping route have pushed up energy prices, increased freight costs and created uncertainty across global supply chains.
The Iran crisis reinforces the need for energy resilience
The current situation highlights that ESG is about understanding risk, strengthening resilience and helping organisations adapt when global events disrupt business operations.
Shipping provides a good example. As vessels divert around the Cape of Good Hope to avoid conflict zones, transit times are becoming longer, and fuel consumption is increasing. Eco-Business notes that these diversions can significantly increase shipping emissions, while UNCTAD estimates that a round trip between Singapore and Northern Europe can generate around 70% more carbon emissions when rerouted.
The environmental impact also extends beyond carbon emissions. According to Eco-Business, attacks on energy infrastructure increase the risk of oil spills, deteriorating air quality, contaminated water supplies and damage to fragile marine ecosystems. Researchers from the Conflict and Environment Observatory have already documented more than 120 incidents of environmental harm linked to the conflict, highlighting how environmental consequences often continue long after active hostilities end.

-
Ripple effects across Asia
While the conflict is centred in the Middle East, its economic effects are being felt across Asia.
The IMF notes that higher fuel costs are flowing through to manufacturing, transportation and household expenses, placing additional pressure on energy-importing economies. At the same time, supply chain disruptions are affecting fertiliser availability, logistics and commodity prices, increasing the risk of inflation across multiple sectors.
Eco-Business reports that the conflict has disrupted around one-third of globally traded fertilisers, while higher energy prices are increasing production, storage and transportation costs throughout Southeast Asia's food supply chains. The publication argues that the region's long-term resilience will depend on diversifying energy sources, strengthening supply chains and investing in more sustainable and regenerative agricultural systems.
The latest market survey conducted by Relo Network Asia also highlights how these global pressures are beginning to influence individual markets in different ways.
- · In Singapore, the relocation market remains stable, although rising utility costs and transportation expenses continue to be monitored due to the country's reliance on imported energy.
- · Hong Kong presents a more nuanced picture. Rising fuel prices have increased shipping and aviation costs, with airlines introducing fuel surcharges and freight operators facing longer transit times. At the same time, Hong Kong's stability has reinforced its appeal as a financial centre, with officials highlighting opportunities to attract investment seeking a safe and well-regulated market amid geopolitical uncertainty. This demonstrates how the same crisis can create both operational challenges and economic opportunities.
- · Thailand has largely contained the immediate impact through fuel price controls, although broader inflationary pressures are beginning to filter through the economy. This demonstrates how government policy can moderate short-term volatility while businesses continue planning for longer-term cost increases.
- · South Korea has expanded nationwide energy conservation initiatives, encouraging businesses and households to reduce electricity consumption, adopt more energy-efficient technologies and make greater use of public transport. These measures demonstrate how governments are responding proactively to improve energy resilience rather than simply reacting to higher prices.
- · Vietnam shows how energy shocks can quickly become workplace and mobility issues. Vietnam is among the Southeast Asian economies highly reliant on imported oil and gas, making it exposed to fuel price volatility linked to the Iran crisis. Vietnam has also introduced work-from-home policies for many public sector workers in response to higher energy costs.
What this means for global mobility
For global mobility professionals, geopolitical developments increasingly influence everyday operational decisions.
Longer shipping routes can extend household goods transit times and increase relocation costs. Higher energy prices may affect temporary accommodation, utilities and cost-of-living allowances. Supply chain disruptions can also delay the delivery of household goods and other essential services, requiring organisations to communicate more proactively with relocating employees.
At the same time, employee expectations are evolving. Assignees increasingly require confidence that organisations understand geopolitical risks, have contingency plans in place and can respond quickly when circumstances change. Business resilience therefore becomes an important part of the employee experience as well as operational planning.
Building resilience through ESG
Although geopolitical events create uncertainty, they also reinforce the value of long-term ESG investment.
Energy-efficient buildings, renewable energy, diversified supply chains and stronger business continuity planning all help organisations respond more effectively to disruption. Eco-Business also highlights an important advantage of decentralised renewable energy systems: because they generate energy locally, they are less dependent on vulnerable international supply routes and energy chokepoints.
For businesses operating across multiple markets, resilience is becoming a competitive advantage.
Organisations that monitor regional risks, communicate transparently with employees and continue investing in sustainable operations are generally better positioned to manage future disruptions.
Looking ahead
The Middle East crisis illustrates how interconnected today's business environment has become. A conflict thousands of kilometres away can influence energy prices, relocation costs, food security, carbon emissions and supply chain performance across Asia.
Sustainability, resilience and business continuity are increasingly interconnected. Building more adaptable supply chains, improving energy efficiency and planning for geopolitical uncertainty are becoming essential components of responsible business strategy.
As organisations continue navigating an increasingly complex global landscape, ESG will remain an important framework for managing both long-term sustainability goals and the practical challenges of operating in an unpredictable world.
References
Cressey, D. (2026) "As the Gulf conflict widens, so does its environmental footprint", Dialogue Earth / Eco-Business, 9 March. Available at: https://www.eco-business.com/news/as-the-gulf-conflict-widens-so-does-its-environmental-footprint/
Eco-Business (2026) "Chokepoint in the Gulf: what the US-Israeli war on Iran means for Southeast Asia's food security", Opinion, Eco-Business. Available at: https://www.eco-business.com/opinion/chokepoint-in-the-gulf-what-the-us-israeli-war-on-iran-means-for-southeast-asias-food-security/
Eco-Business (2026) "Iran's water weapon against the Gulf", Opinion, Eco-Business. Available at: https://www.eco-business.com/opinion/irans-water-weapon-against-the-gulf/
Eco-Business (2026) "Why Iran is attacking Gulf energy infrastructure", Opinion, Eco-Business. Available at: https://www.eco-business.com/opinion/why-iran-is-attacking-gulf-energy-infrastructure/
Global Finance Magazine (2026) "Middle East: key trends shaping 2026", Economics Policy Regulation. Available at: https://gfmag.com/economics-policy-regulation/middle-east-key-trends-shaping-2026/
Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) (2026) "Impact of Middle East crisis on global energy markets". Available at: https://ieefa.org/impact-middle-east-crisis-global-energy-markets
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2026) "How the war in the Middle East is affecting energy, trade and finance", IMF Blog, 30 March. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2026/03/30/how-the-war-in-the-middle-east-is-affecting-energy-trade-and-finance
Kakakhel, K. (2026) "The Gulf conflict shows climate finance must evolve to withstand geopolitics", Dialogue Earth / Eco-Business, 31 March. Available at: https://www.eco-business.com/news/the-gulf-conflict-shows-climate-finance-must-evolve-to-withstand-geopolitics/
Royal London Asset Management (RLAM) (2026) "Geopolitical shocks: key Middle East ESG implications for responsible investors", 2026. Available at: https://www.rlam.com/uk/intermediaries/our-views/2026/geopolitical-shocks-key-middle-east-esg-implications-for-responsible-investors/
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (n.d.) "Strait of Hormuz disruptions: the burden of oil price shocks on vulnerable economies". Available at: https://unctad.org/publication/strait-hormuz-disruptions-burden-oil-price-shocks-vulnerable-economies